Summary
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia dismisses without prejudice a pro se, multi-plaintiff § 1983 complaint concerning the handling of incarcerated plaintiffs’ legal mail. The court holds that incarcerated plaintiffs may not join in a single in forma pauperis action under the Prison Litigation Reform Act and that pro se plaintiffs may not pursue class-action claims or represent other prisoners. Each plaintiff may file a separate complaint and must separately pay the filing fee or submit a proper in forma pauperis application.
Holdings
- Incarcerated plaintiffs proceeding in forma pauperis may not join together in a single action and pay only one filing fee; each prisoner must file a separate lawsuit and pay the full filing fee or separately satisfy the requirements for proceeding in forma pauperis.
- A pro se incarcerated plaintiff may not represent other prisoners in a class action or seek relief on behalf of other plaintiffs because an unrepresented litigant cannot adequately represent the interests of others.
- The joint complaint must be dismissed without prejudice, and the pending motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis must be denied as moot.
Questions Presented
- Whether multiple incarcerated plaintiffs may join as plaintiffs in one in forma pauperis action and pay only one filing fee under the Prison Litigation Reform Act.
- Whether a pro se incarcerated plaintiff may assert claims on behalf of other plaintiffs or maintain a class action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 without counsel.
- Whether the joint complaint should be dismissed without prejudice and the motion to proceed in forma pauperis denied as moot.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (5)
- Hubbard v. Haley, 262 F.3d 1194, 1197-98 (11th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Wallace v. Smith, 145 F. App'x 300, 302 (11th Cir. 2005) (per curiam)(followed)
- Ferentinos v. Kissimmee Utility Authority, 604 F. App'x 808, 809 (11th Cir. 2015) (per curiam)(followed)
- Massimo v. Henderson, 468 F.2d 1209, 1210 (5th Cir. 1972) (per curiam)(followed)
- Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206, 1209 (11th Cir. 1981) (en banc)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…