Bradley M. Houston v. Officer Whitney

Houston v. Whitney · United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia, Macon Division · February 20, 2026 · No. 5:25-cv-409-MTT-CHW

Summary

The United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia grants Bradley M. Houston leave to proceed in forma pauperis and permits his Eighth Amendment medical-treatment claims against Officer Whitney to proceed. The court recommends denying Houston’s request for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction concerning alleged threats at a different prison. The order also addresses service, discovery, filing obligations, and disclosure and preservation of video or photographic evidence.

Holdings

  1. Houston demonstrated that he was unable to pay the initial partial filing fee, so the complaint could be filed without prepayment of that partial fee; he remains obligated to pay the full filing fee through statutory installments.
  2. The amended complaint plausibly alleged an Eighth Amendment deliberate-indifference claim against Whitney, and the claim should proceed for further factual development.
  3. Houston's request for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction should be denied because he did not establish the required likelihood of success and did not show a sufficient relationship between the requested relief and the conduct alleged in the complaint.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Houston demonstrated entitlement to proceed in forma pauperis without paying an initial partial filing fee.
  2. Whether the amended complaint plausibly stated an Eighth Amendment deliberate-indifference claim against Officer Whitney sufficient to proceed past preliminary screening.
  3. Whether Houston was entitled to a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction concerning alleged threats at a different prison by persons and conduct not connected to the medical-treatment claim against Whitney.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (21)

  • Carmichael v. United States, 966 F.3d 1250, 1258 (11th Cir. 2020)(followed)
  • Miller v. Donald, 541 F.3d 1091, 1100 (11th Cir. 2008)(followed)
  • Daker v. Ward, 999 F.3d 1300, 1308, 1310 (11th Cir. 2021)(followed)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
  • Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555-56, 570 (2007)(followed)
  • Hale v. Tallapoosa County, 50 F.3d 1579, 1582 (11th Cir. 1995)(followed)
  • Bingham v. Thomas, 654 F.3d 1171, 1176-77 (11th Cir. 2011)(followed)
  • Wade v. McDade, 106 F.4th 1251, 1255, 1262 (11th Cir. 2024) (en banc)(followed)
  • Pintando v. Miami-Dade Housing Agency, 501 F.3d 1241, 1243 (11th Cir. 2007)(followed)
  • Farrow v. West, 320 F.3d 1235, 1243 (11th Cir. 2003)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 21.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…