Michael Joel Rozier v. McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce LLC, et al.

Summary

The court denied Michael Joel Rozier's motions for reconsideration of orders denying his motion for a temporary restraining order and dismissing his claims against New American Funding. The court held that Rozier did not establish an intervening change in law, newly discovered evidence, or clear legal error, and rejected his sovereign-citizen and standing arguments as meritless.

Holdings

1. Reconsideration was unwarranted because Rozier did not identify an intervening change in law, newly discovered evidence, or clear error of law.
2. Rozier did not establish clear error in the dismissal order; his contention that New American Funding lacked standing was legally meritless because New American Funding was the defendant Rozier sued.

Questions Presented

1. Whether Rozier demonstrated a basis under Local Rule 7.6 for reconsideration of the order denying his motion for a temporary restraining order.
2. Whether Rozier demonstrated clear error in the order dismissing his claims against New American Funding by arguing that the defendant lacked standing to enforce a void debt and that the mortgage was a nullity.

Disposition

denied