Summary
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Georgia granted Southwind Risk Retention Group, Inc.’s motion for judgment on the pleadings in Kenneth Daniels’s motor-vehicle-accident renewal action. The court held that, under the federal Liability Risk Retention Act, Southwind was not subject to Georgia’s direct-action statute because it was a foreign risk retention group.
Holdings
- A foreign risk retention group is not subject to a direct action in Georgia under O.C.G.A. § 40-2-140 because the Liability Risk Retention Act preempts state regulation of the group's insurance operations.
- Judgment on the pleadings was appropriate because the complaint's allegations, accepted as true, did not establish a legally viable direct-action claim against Southwind.
Questions Presented
- Whether Southwind Risk Retention Group, Inc., a foreign risk retention group, is subject to a direct action in Georgia under O.C.G.A. § 40-2-140.
- Whether Southwind was entitled to judgment on the pleadings under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c).
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (10)
- Daniels v. Main Highway Logistics LLC, No. 7:23-CV-132 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. 2024)(prior procedural history)
- Davide M. Carbone v. Cable News Network, Inc., Carbone v. Cable News Network, Inc., 910 F.3d 1345, 1350 (11th Cir. 2018)(followed)
- King v. Akima Glob. Servs., 775 F. App’x 617, 620 (11th Cir. 2019) (per curiam)(followed)
- Perez v. Wells Fargo N.A., 774 F.3d 1329, 1335 (11th Cir. 2014)(followed)
- Cannon v. City of W. Palm Beach, 250 F.3d 1299, 1301 (11th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Stanton v. Larsh, 239 F.2d 104, 106 (5th Cir. 1956)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
- Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 556, 570 (2007)(followed)
- Reis v. OOIDA Risk Retention Grp., Inc., 814 S.E.2d 338, 343 (Ga. 2018)(followed)
- Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc. v. Bartlett, 570 U.S. 472, 479–80 (2013)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…