Summary
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana grants Commerce Title & Abstract Company’s motion for summary judgment in Yvette Bergeron’s action alleging age discrimination under the ADEA and the Louisiana Employment Discrimination Law. The court concludes that Bergeron failed to present sufficient evidence from which a reasonable jury could find that age was the but-for cause of her termination. The opinion discusses the parties’ employment arrangements, remote-work policies, alleged termination reasons, and the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework.
Holdings
- Bergeron failed to establish a prima facie case of age discrimination because she did not identify a younger retained employee whose employment circumstances were nearly identical to hers, and she presented no other direct or circumstantial evidence that Commerce Title intended to discriminate based on age.
- Even assuming Bergeron established a prima facie case, Commerce Title was entitled to summary judgment because it articulated legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for terminating her and Bergeron did not produce sufficient evidence from which a reasonable factfinder could conclude that those reasons were pretextual for age discrimination.
- Bergeron's LEDL age-discrimination claim failed for the same reasons as her ADEA claim and could not survive summary judgment.
Questions Presented
- Whether Bergeron established a prima facie case of age discrimination under the ADEA where Commerce Title did not replace her and she failed to identify a younger, similarly situated retained employee or other evidence connecting the termination to age.
- Whether Commerce Title articulated legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for Bergeron's termination and whether Bergeron produced sufficient evidence that those reasons were pretextual.
- Whether Bergeron's Louisiana Employment Discrimination Law age-discrimination claim survived summary judgment under the same framework applied to her ADEA claim.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (46)
- Pioneer Exploration, L.L.C. v. Steadfast Insurance Co., 767 F.3d 503, 511 (5th Cir. 2014)(followed)
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986)(followed)
- Wease v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, L.L.C., 915 F.3d 987, 997 (5th Cir. 2019)(followed)
- Stahl v. Novartis Pharmaceutical Corp., 283 F.3d 254, 263 (5th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586-87 (1986)(followed)
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp., 37 F.3d 1069, 1075 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc) (per curiam)(followed)
- International Shortstop, Inc. v. Rally's, Inc., 939 F.2d 1257, 1263 (5th Cir. 1991)(followed)
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973)(followed)
- Dabbasi v. Motiva Enterprises, L.L.C., 107 F.4th 500, 505, 507 (5th Cir. 2024)(followed)
- Jackson v. Cal-Western Packaging Corp., 602 F.3d 374, 378 (5th Cir. 2010)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 46.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.