Summary
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania adopts a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and dismisses Wilberson Severe Dalicier’s complaint with prejudice because it violates a previously issued injunction. The court also denies the plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis as moot and directs the clerk to close the case.
Holdings
- When no objections are filed to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the district court may review the uncontested portions for clear error, give them reasoned consideration, and adopt the recommendation when the record supports it.
- Plaintiff's complaint was properly dismissed with prejudice because it violated an injunction previously issued by the court.
- The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was denied as moot after the complaint was dismissed.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should adopt the magistrate judge's uncontested report and recommendation recommending dismissal of the complaint with prejudice for violating a previously issued injunction.
- Whether Plaintiff's pending motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis should be denied as moot following dismissal of the complaint.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (3)
- Nara v. Frank, 488 F.3d 187, 194 (3d Cir. 2007)(followed)
- Henderson v. Carlson, 812 F.2d 874, 878-79 (3d Cir. 1987)(followed)
- EEOC v. City of Long Branch, 866 F.3d 93, 100 (3d Cir. 2017)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…