Summary
The court granted Experian Information Solutions, Inc.'s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss Elijah Tyrell Taylor's amended complaint alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act and 18 U.S.C. § 1028. The court dismissed the § 1028 claim with prejudice and dismissed the FCRA claims without prejudice because the amended complaint was unclear, internally inconsistent, and failed to identify actionable inaccuracies or other facts supporting liability. Taylor was granted thirty days to file a second amended complaint addressing the identified deficiencies.
Holdings
- The amended complaint failed to state a claim under the Fair Credit Reporting Act because it did not identify a coherent theory of liability or adequately allege specific inaccuracies in Taylor's consumer reports.
- Section 1028 does not provide a private right of action to a litigant such as Taylor.
- Taylor was granted thirty days to file a second amended complaint limited to his FCRA claims and addressing the pleading deficiencies identified by the court.
Questions Presented
- Whether Taylor's amended complaint stated a plausible claim under the Fair Credit Reporting Act.
- Whether 18 U.S.C. § 1028 provides a private right of action.
- Whether Taylor should be granted leave to amend his FCRA claims.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (7)
- Binsack v. Lackawanna Cnty. Prison, 438 F. App'x 158, 160 (3d Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Glover v. F.D.I.C., 698 F.3d 139, 147 (3d Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Garrett v. Wexford Health, 938 F.3d 69, 92 (3d Cir. 2019)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
- Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 570 (2007)(followed)
- Obianyo v. Tennessee, 518 F. App'x 71, 72 (3d Cir. 2013)(followed)
- Gonzaga Univ. v. Doe, 536 U.S. 273, 283-84 (2002)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…