Summary
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania granted Valeriia Pak’s 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas petition challenging her immigration detention. The court held that Pak’s detention was governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a), rather than the mandatory-detention provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b), and that detention without an opportunity for a bond determination violated procedural due process. The court ordered her release, required the return of her belongings and identification documents, and permanently enjoined re-detention under § 1225(b).
Holdings
- Under the immediate-custodian rule, the warden of the facility where Pak was detained, Angela Hoover, was the proper respondent; Michael T. Rose was dismissed as a respondent.
- The district court retained jurisdiction under § 2241 to determine whether Pak was detained under the correct statutory provision and whether she was entitled to a bond hearing.
- Pak was not shown to be an arriving alien subject to expedited removal and detention under § 1225(b)(1).
- Section 1226(a), not § 1225(b)(1) or § 1225(b)(2)(A), applied to Pak's detention because she was no longer actively seeking admission after residing in the United States for more than two years; detention under § 1225(b) was therefore improper.
- Detaining Pak under § 1225(b), thereby denying her an opportunity for a bond determination, violated the procedural Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court had subject-matter jurisdiction under § 2241 to review Pak's detention despite statutory limits associated with removal proceedings.
- Whether Pak was properly subject to mandatory detention under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1) or § 1225(b)(2)(A), rather than detention under § 1226(a).
- Whether detention under § 1225(b), without an opportunity for a bond determination, violated Pak's procedural due process rights under the Fifth Amendment.
- Whether Angela Hoover was the proper respondent under the immediate-custodian rule.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (24)
- Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 434 (2004)(followed)
- Anariba v. Dir. Hudson Cnty. Corr. Ctr., 17 F.4th 434, 444 (3d Cir. 2021)(followed)
- Trump v. J. G. G., 604 U.S. 670, 672 (2025)(followed)
- Nance v. Ward, 597 U.S. 159, 167 (2022)(followed)
- Martinez v. McAleenan, 385 F. Supp. 3d 349 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)(followed)
- A.L. v. Oddo, 761 F. Supp. 3d 822, 827 (W.D. Pa. 2025)(followed)
- Khalil v. President, United States, 164 F.4th 259, 273-79 (3d Cir. 2026)(followed)
- Jennings v. Rodriguez, 583 U.S. 281, 285-94 (2018)(followed)
- Matter of Yajure Pak, 29 I. & N. Dec. 126 (BIA 2025)(not followed)
- Martinez v. Hyde, 792 F. Supp. 3d 211, 214 (D. Mass. July 24, 2025)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 24.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.