Gregory Ryan Webb v. Deputy f/n/u Powers, et al.

No. 2:23-cv-65 · United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, Cookeville Division · February 17, 2026 · No. 2:23-cv-65

Summary

The court denied Plaintiff Gregory Ryan Webb’s motions seeking a filing-fee refund, an extension of time to serve defendants, and other relief. It dismissed the action without prejudice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) because Webb failed to establish proper service of process and did not show that a further extension was warranted.

Holdings

  1. A further discretionary extension was not warranted because plaintiff did not establish good cause or provide sufficient equitable grounds for extending the service deadline after repeated notice, prior additional latitude, and failure to document effective service.
  2. The action was dismissed without prejudice because plaintiff failed to effect service of process on any defendant in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
  3. Plaintiff was not entitled to a refund of the filing fee because he voluntarily paid the fee and did not allege that it was collected without authority or because of clerical administrative error.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court should grant plaintiff a further extension of time to serve defendants under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m).
  2. Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice for failure to effect service of process.
  3. Whether plaintiff was entitled to a refund of the filing fee so that he could proceed in forma pauperis.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (14)

  • Rashada v. Gonzales, No. 1:07-CV-1055, 2007 WL 1795873, at *1 (N.D. Ohio June 20, 2007)(followed)
  • Montoya v. Cap. One, N.A., No. 2:21-cv-11978, 2022 WL 957548, at *1 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 29, 2022)(followed)
  • Morrow v. Tri County Jail, No. 3:23-cv-21, 2023 WL 5289382, at *2 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 17, 2023)(followed)
  • Grindling v. Martone, No. 12-00361, 2012 WL 4502954, at *1 (D. Haw. Sept. 28, 2012)(followed)
  • Thorpe v. Snyder County Domestic Relations Section, 2005 WL 1155011, at *1 (M.D. Penn. Apr. 29, 2005)(followed)
  • Friedman v. Est. of Presser, 929 F.2d 1151, 1156-57 (6th Cir. 1991)(followed)
  • Del Raine v. Carlson, 826 F.2d 698, 704 (7th Cir. 1987)(followed)
  • Ace Am. Ins. Co. v. Meadowlands Dev. Ltd. P'ship, 140 F. Supp. 3d 450, 455 (E.D. Pa. 2015)(followed)
  • King v. Taylor, 694 F.3d 650, 655 (6th Cir. 2012)(followed)
  • Mann v. Castiel, 681 F.3d 368, 372 (D.C. Cir. 2012)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 14.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from United States District Court For The Middle District Of Tennessee Cookeville Division United States