Summary
A United States magistrate judge recommends dismissing Donald Halicek’s civil-rights action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. The recommendation relies on the prolonged failure to identify and substitute an appropriate successor or representative after Halicek’s death and advises that objections may be filed within fourteen days.
Holdings
- The magistrate judge recommended dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) because the docket showed a clear record of delay: no one had identified or substituted an appropriate successor or representative after the plaintiff's death despite notice and a court-ordered deadline.
Questions Presented
- Whether the action should be dismissed sua sponte under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute when, after the plaintiff's death, no successor or representative was identified or substituted for nearly two years.
- Whether the record of delay supported dismissal even though the prejudice and lesser-sanctions factors were not applicable in the posture of the case.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (9)
- Rogers v. City of Warren, 302 F. App’x 371, 375 n.4 (6th Cir. 2008)(followed)
- Knoll v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co., 176 F.3d 359, 363 (6th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- Schafer v. City of Defiance Police Dep’t, 529 F.3d 731, 740 (6th Cir. 2008)(followed)
- Carter v. City of Memphis, 636 F.2d 159, 161 (6th Cir. 1980)(followed)
- Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 49 (1991)(followed)
- Alvarez v. San Juan VA Med. Ctr., No. 3:17-CV-0049, 2021 WL 1136069, at *1 (D.V.I. Mar. 24, 2021)(analogized)
- Worthy v. Accumarine Transp., No. 09-00664-WS-N, 2010 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 77859, at *1 (S.D. Ala. May 19, 2010)(analogized)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 155 (1985)(followed)
- Cowherd v. Million, 380 F.3d 909, 912 (6th Cir. 2004)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…