Mason Sales, LLC v. Talent Creation, LTD, and Mornington Corp., aka Mornington Corporation

No. 3:24-cv-00092 (M.D. Tenn. Mar. 17, 2026) · United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee · March 17, 2026 · No. 3:24-cv-00092

Summary

The United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee partially granted defendants’ motion to dismiss claims arising from unpaid sales commissions. The court held that service through the Tennessee Secretary of State was proper, that it had specific personal jurisdiction over the defendants, and that venue was proper. Claims for breach of contract, promissory estoppel, and quantum meruit survived, while claims for equitable accounting, breach of fiduciary duty, separate breach of good faith, bad faith, and spoliation were dismissed.

Holdings

  1. Service on the Tennessee Secretary of State was proper under Tenn. Code Ann. § 48-15-104(b) because defendants conducted affairs in Tennessee without a certificate of authority, and the statute's 'conduct affairs' language is broader than the 'transact business' standard in § 48-25-101.
  2. The court has specific personal jurisdiction over defendants because they purposefully availed themselves of Tennessee, the claims arise from those contacts, and exercising jurisdiction is reasonable.
  3. Venue is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2) because a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred in the district.
  4. The breach of contract, promissory estoppel, and quantum meruit claims survive dismissal because the complaint alleged adequate consideration and unjust enrichment.
  5. The equitable accounting claim fails because legal remedies are adequate. The breach of fiduciary duty claim fails because no fiduciary relationship existed. The duty of good faith and bad faith claims fail as standalone causes of action. Spoliation is not an independent cause of action.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether service of process on the Tennessee Secretary of State was proper for foreign corporations
  2. Whether the court has personal jurisdiction over the defendants
  3. Whether venue is proper in the Middle District of Tennessee
  4. Whether plaintiff's breach of contract, promissory estoppel, quantum meruit, equitable accounting, breach of fiduciary duty, duty of good faith, bad faith, and spoliation claims survive a motion to dismiss

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (23)

  • King v. Taylor, 694 F.3d 650 (6th Cir. 2012)(cited_by)
  • Savoie v. City of E. Lansing, No. 21-2684, 2022 WL 3643339 (6th Cir. Aug. 24, 2022)(cited_by)
  • Spencer v. Caracal Int'l, LLC, 516 F. Supp. 3d 755 (M.D. Tenn. 2021)(cited_by)
  • Alison Group, Inc. v. Ericson, 181 S.W.3d 670 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2005)(distinguished)
  • Malone v. Stanley Black & Decker, Inc., 965 F.3d 499 (6th Cir. 2020)(cited_by)
  • Peters Broad. Eng'g, Inc. v. 24 Cap., LLC, 40 F.4th 432 (6th Cir. 2022)(cited_by)
  • International Shoe Co. v. State of Washington, Int'l Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310 (1945)(cited_by)
  • Parker v. Winwood, 938 F.3d 833 (6th Cir. 2019)(cited_by)
  • Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Still N The Water Pub., 327 F.3d 472 (6th Cir. 2003)(cited_by)
  • Miller v. AXA Winterthur Ins. Co., 694 F.3d 675 (6th Cir. 2012)(cited_by)

Showing top 10 of 23.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…