Summary
The court construed the plaintiff's cover letter as notice of a change of address and directed the Clerk to update his address. Because the plaintiff had been released from custody, the court required him to submit a new application to proceed without prepaying fees or pay the filing fee within 30 days, and denied his prior in forma pauperis application as moot.
Holdings
- Because Plaintiff had been released from custody, he was required to submit a new in forma pauperis application based on his current financial status if he wished to proceed as a pauper, or instead pay the full civil filing fee.
- Plaintiff's original in forma pauperis application was denied as moot after his release from custody.
Questions Presented
- Whether a plaintiff who filed an in forma pauperis application while incarcerated must submit a new application based on current financial circumstances after release from custody.
- Whether the court should update Plaintiff's address and provide an opportunity to continue the action by submitting a new in forma pauperis application or paying the full filing fee.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (1)
- In re Prison Reform Litigation Act, 105 F.3d 1131, 1139 (6th Cir. 1997)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…