Summary
The United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee adopts a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation in Apartment Insiders, LLC v. Hensen. The Court denies Mirakle Hensen’s Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss claims involving alleged trade-secret misappropriation and breach of a Business Protection Agreement, and denies Apartment Insiders’ request to amend its complaint. No objections to the report and recommendation were filed.
Holdings
- When no party files timely objections to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation, the district court is not required to conduct de novo or other independent review of the unobjected-to portions and may adopt the recommendation.
- Hensen's motion to dismiss Apartment Insiders' complaint was denied.
- Apartment Insiders' request to amend its complaint, made in its response to the motion to dismiss, was denied.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court should adopt the magistrate judge's report and recommendation when no party filed objections.
- Whether Hensen's Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss should be denied.
- Whether Apartment Insiders should be permitted to amend its complaint based on a request made in its response to the motion to dismiss.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (5)
- Frias v. Frias, No. 2:18-CV-00076, 2019 WL 549506, at *2 (M.D. Tenn. Feb. 12, 2019)(followed)
- Hart v. Bee Prop. Mgmt., Inc., No. 18-CV-11851, 2019 WL 1242372, at *1 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 18, 2019)(followed)
- Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-50 (1985)(followed)
- Ashraf v. Adventist Health Sys./Sunbelt, Inc., 322 F. Supp. 3d 879, 881 (W.D. Tenn. 2018)(followed)
- Benson v. Walden Sec., No. 3:18-CV-00010, 2018 WL 6322332, at *3 (M.D. Tenn. Dec. 4, 2018)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…