Jeremy J. Dalton v. Demetrius Geofrey, Warden

Dalton v. Geofrey, No. 2:26-cv-00011 · United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee · April 23, 2026 · No. 2:26-cv-00011

Summary

The United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee grants Jeremy Dalton’s application to proceed in forma pauperis in his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas action. The court dismisses the petition without prejudice because Dalton has not exhausted available Tennessee state-court remedies, including a pending post-conviction appeal. The court denies a certificate of appealability.

Holdings

  1. A state prisoner generally must exhaust all available state-court remedies before obtaining federal habeas relief, and Dalton had not satisfied that requirement because his state post-conviction proceedings remained pending.
  2. A federal district court may dismiss a § 2254 petition at preliminary review when the petition itself and attached materials show that the petitioner is not entitled to relief, including because available state remedies have not been exhausted.
  3. A certificate of appealability should be denied because reasonable jurists would not debate the court's procedural ruling that Dalton had failed to exhaust available state remedies.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the § 2254 petition should be dismissed at preliminary review because Dalton had not exhausted available state-court remedies.
  2. Whether Dalton was entitled to a certificate of appealability after the petition was dismissed on procedural grounds.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (16)

  • Crump v. Lafler, 657 F.3d 393, 396 n.2 (6th Cir. 2011)(followed)
  • McFarland v. Scott, 512 U.S. 849, 856 (1994)(followed)
  • Lyons v. Stovall, 188 F.3d 327, 332 n.3 (6th Cir. 1999)(followed)
  • Granader v. Pub. Bank, 417 F.2d 75, 82 (6th Cir. 1969)(followed)
  • Shah v. Quintana, No. 17-5053, 2017 WL 7000265, at *2 (6th Cir. July 17, 2017)(followed)
  • Allen v. Perini, 424 F.2d 134, 141 (6th Cir. 1970)(followed)
  • Clinkscale v. Carter, 375 F.3d 430, 436-437 (6th Cir. 2004)(followed)
  • Harris v. Rees, 794 F.2d 1168, 1170 (6th Cir. 1986)(followed)
  • Pillow v. Burton, 852 F. App’x 986, 990 (6th Cir. 2021)(followed)
  • O’Sullivan v. Boerckel, 526 U.S. 838, 845 (1999)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 16.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…