Summary
The court granted Talladega Housing Authority’s motion to stay and compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act in Vickey Robinson Hall’s employment-discrimination action. The court held that Hall specifically challenged the arbitration agreement’s delegation provision, but failed to show that the provision was unconscionable under Alabama law. The court therefore directed the parties to arbitrate Hall’s broader challenges to the agreement’s validity and enforceability and ordered a joint status report.
Holdings
- Hall specifically challenged the delegation provision because her argument that THA reserved for itself the right to have a court decide the arbitrability of THA's claims went to the parties' precise agreement to delegate threshold arbitrability issues. Her arguments concerning inferior bargaining power and arbitration costs, standing alone, challenged the arbitration agreement as a whole rather than the delegation provision specifically.
- The delegation provision was not unconscionable under Alabama law because, although it restricted Hall's access to court while allowing THA to seek judicial determinations concerning its claims, it did not limit Hall's available remedies in arbitration.
- Because Hall's specific challenge to the delegation provision failed, the court was required to enforce the delegation provision, leave Hall's broader challenges to the arbitration agreement to the arbitrator, stay the federal action, and compel arbitration under 9 U.S.C. §§ 3-4.
Questions Presented
- Whether Hall specifically challenged the arbitration agreement's delegation provision rather than merely challenging the arbitration agreement as a whole.
- Whether the delegation provision was unconscionable under Alabama law because it gave THA a litigation option unavailable to Hall.
- Whether the court was required under the Federal Arbitration Act to stay the action and compel arbitration after rejecting Hall's specific challenge to the delegation provision.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (13)
- Burch v. P.J. Cheese, Inc., 861 F.3d 1338, 1346 (11th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Bazemore v. Jefferson Capital Systems, LLC, 837 F.3d 1325, 1333 (11th Cir. 2016)(followed)
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 24 (1983)(followed)
- Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson, 561 U.S. 63, 67-68, 71-72 (2010)(followed)
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. Casarotto, 517 U.S. 681, 687 (1996)(followed)
- Parm v. National Bank of California, N.A., 835 F.3d 1331, 1334-35 (11th Cir. 2016)(followed)
- JPay, Inc. v. Kobel, 904 F.3d 923, 936-40 (11th Cir. 2018)(followed)
- Becker v. Delek US Energy, Inc., 39 F.4th 351, 355 (6th Cir. 2022)(followed)
- Attix v. Carrington Mortgage Services, Inc., 35 F.4th 1284, 1303-04 (11th Cir. 2022)(followed)
- Cherry, Bekaert & Holland v. Brown, 582 So. 2d 502, 506 (Ala. 1991)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 13.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…