Martinez v. Gamboa

No. 21-cv-02744-EMC (N.D. Cal. Mar. 9, 2023) · United States District Court for the Northern District of California · March 9, 2023 · No. 21-cv-02744-EMC

Summary

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California screened Ronald F. Martinez’s First Amended Complaint alleging deliberate indifference to a serious medical need under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court dismissed the claims against Drs. Gordon, Hrobko, Hack, and Bright, but found a cognizable Eighth Amendment claim against Dr. Gamboa based on alleged delays and interference concerning a biopsy of a lesion later diagnosed as squamous cell carcinoma. The court also resolved several motions and established a briefing schedule for dispositive motions.

Holdings

  1. The First Amended Complaint failed to state an Eighth Amendment deliberate-indifference claim against Drs. Gordon and Hrobko because both independently diagnosed the lesions as seborrheic keratoses and provided treatment that resolved one lesion and partially resolved the other; their conduct did not amount to deliberate indifference.
  2. The First Amended Complaint failed to state a claim against Dr. Hack because Dr. Hack provided the biopsy referral Martinez sought, and the alleged failure to complete the biopsy was attributed to Dr. Gamboa.
  3. The First Amended Complaint failed to state a claim against Dr. Bright because no facts suggested that Dr. Bright saw or denied a biopsy request; his alleged involvement was limited to denying Dr. Gamboa's request for a third cryotherapy treatment.
  4. The First Amended Complaint stated a cognizable Eighth Amendment deliberate-indifference claim against Dr. Gamboa.
  5. The court could not order Corcoran State Prison to return the property because it lacked jurisdiction to grant that relief; Corcoran State Prison and Martinez's current institution were outside the relevant district.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the First Amended Complaint stated an Eighth Amendment deliberate-indifference claim against the individual medical defendants.
  2. Whether the allegations against Dr. Gamboa were sufficient to survive screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.
  3. Whether the court had jurisdiction to order Corcoran State Prison to return property allegedly confiscated from Martinez.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (12)

  • Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1990)(followed)
  • Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)(followed)
  • West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988)(followed)
  • Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 832, 834, 837 (1994)(followed)
  • Jett v. Penner, 439 F.3d 1091, 1096 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Toguchi v. Chung, 391 F.3d 1051, 1060 (9th Cir. 2004)(followed)
  • McGuckin v. Smith, 974 F.2d 1050, 1059 (9th Cir. 1992)(limited)
  • WMX Technologies, Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc)(overruled_in_part)
  • O’Loughlin v. Doe, 920 F.2d 614, 617 (9th Cir. 1990)(followed)
  • Franklin v. Oregon, 662 F.2d 1337, 1344 (9th Cir. 1981)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 12.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…

More from United States District Court For The Northern District Of California United States District Court Fo