Summary
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California grants defendants’ administrative motion to seal financial documents filed in connection with approval of the parties’ settlement agreement. Applying the compelling-reasons standard, the court finds that the documents contain confidential financial, personal, payroll, tax, banking, and loan information whose disclosure could cause improper use or competitive harm.
Holdings
- Because the documents were produced in support of settlement negotiations and settlement approval was dispositive of the claims, the compelling-reasons standard governed the motion to seal.
- Compelling reasons justified sealing the financial documents because they contained extensive confidential financial and personal information that could be used for an improper purpose or cause competitive harm, and those interests outweighed the public interest in disclosure.
Questions Presented
- Whether the financial documents submitted in connection with approval of the parties' settlement agreement should be sealed under the compelling-reasons standard.
- Whether defendants' confidentiality, privacy, and competitive-harm interests outweighed the public's interest in access to the judicial records.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (6)
- Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Ctr. for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., LLC, 809 F.3d 1098 (9th Cir. 2016)(followed)
- Taylor v. AFS Techs., Inc., No. CV-092567-PHX-DGC, 2010 WL 2079750 (D. Ariz. May 24, 2010)(followed)
- Exeltis USA Inc. v. First Databank, Inc.(followed)
- Transperfect Global, Inc. v. MotionPoint Corp., No. 10-cv-02590-CW, 2014 WL 4950082 (N.D. Cal. Sept. 25, 2014)(followed)
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589 (1978)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…