Summary
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied the motion to dismiss claims against 1K1V TGJ Holdings, LLC and Hendrik Jordaan for intentional and negligent interference with prospective economic relations. The court held that the allegations plausibly supported a theory that the defendants aided and abetted a director's breach of fiduciary duty and interfered with negotiations involving King Hawaiian. One Thousand and One Voices was dismissed without leave to amend, while the claim directly against Evans was not adjudicated because he had not been properly served.
Holdings
- True adequately stated intentional and negligent interference claims against 1K1V and Jordaan based on allegations that they aided and abetted Evans in breaching his fiduciary duty to True.
- True adequately stated interference claims based on 1K1V's counsel's letter to King Hawaiian insofar as the letter allegedly falsely accused True of being in default on its promissory notes.
- True plausibly alleged that the defendants' interference caused harm even though True's board had rejected King Hawaiian's initial term sheet.
- One Thousand and One Voices was dismissed without leave to amend because the complaint directed no allegations against that defendant and True presented no defendant-specific arguments concerning it.
Questions Presented
- Whether True plausibly alleged that 1K1V and Jordaan aided and abetted Evans's alleged breach of fiduciary duty.
- Whether True plausibly alleged intentional and negligent interference with prospective economic relations based on the defendants' conduct concerning the King Hawaiian offer and the allegedly false default letter.
- Whether the alleged interference plausibly caused harm despite True's board having rejected King Hawaiian's initial term sheet.
- Whether the complaint stated any claim against One Thousand and One Voices.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Apple Inc. v. Superior Court, 18 Cal. App. 5th 222, 254 (2017)(followed)
- Bader v. Anderson, 179 Cal. App. 4th 775, 792 (2009)(followed)
- Rock River Communications, Inc. v. Universal Music Group, Inc., 745 F.3d 343, 351 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.