Summary
The court granted plaintiffs’ motion to strike Humboldt Heals’ answer because the limited liability company was unrepresented by counsel in federal court. The court directed the Clerk to enter default against Humboldt Heals and ordered plaintiffs to file a motion for default judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b) within 60 days.
Holdings
- A limited liability company may not appear in federal court except through counsel admitted to practice before the court.
- The court may strike the answer of an unrepresented limited liability company and direct entry of default when the company fails to obtain counsel after counsel’s withdrawal.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court could strike a limited liability company’s answer when the company failed to obtain counsel after its attorney withdrew.
- Whether default should be entered against the limited liability company after its answer was stricken for failure to appear through counsel.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (6)
- Rowland v. California Men's Colony, 546 U.S. 194, 201-02 (1993)(followed)
- M.O.R.E., LLC v. United States, No. C 12-3609 PJH, 2012 WL 4902802, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 15, 2012)(followed)
- United States v. High Country Broadcasting Co., 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993)(followed)
- TeleVideo Systems, Inc. v. Heidenthal, 826 F.2d 915, 916 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)
- Coastal Environmental Rights Foundation v. Aztec Perlite Co., Inc., No. 24-cv-385-RSH-SBC, 2024 WL 4520350, at *3 (S.D. Cal. Oct. 16, 2024)(followed)
- Girty v. Paradigm Collection LLC, No. 4:23-CV-03239-KAW, 2025 WL 1455817, at *1 (N.D. Cal. May 21, 2025)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…