E.P. v. Frank Bisignano

No. 22-cv-05830-VKD (N.D. Cal. Dec. 31, 2025) · United States District Court for the Northern District of California · December 31, 2025 · No. 22-cv-05830-VKD

Summary

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted counsel’s motion for attorneys’ fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) following a favorable Social Security disability determination on remand. The court awarded $35,200 to counsel under a contingency-fee agreement, finding the fee reasonable and within the statutory 25% limit. The court also found no need to require counsel to refund the previously awarded $8,200 in EAJA fees because those funds had been offset against the claimant’s debt.

Holdings

  1. The requested $35,200 fee was reasonable and could be awarded under § 406(b) because it was within the 25-percent statutory limit, was supported by a valid contingency-fee agreement, reflected successful representation, and was not shown to result from substandard or dilatory conduct.
  2. Under the circumstances presented, counsel was not required to refund the prior $8,200 EAJA award because counsel stated that he had not received those funds, which had been offset by the Treasury Department against E.P.'s debt.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the requested $35,200 attorney's-fee award was reasonable under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) and the contingency-fee agreement.
  2. Whether counsel was required to refund the previously awarded $8,200 EAJA fee to E.P.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (3)

  • Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1144 n.3 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 793, 796, 806-08 (2002)(followed)
  • Butler v. Colvin, No. 3:14-cv-02050-LB, 2017 WL 446290, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2017)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…