Eric X. Murillo v. West County Detention Facility Medical

Case No. 25-cv-09541-RFL · United States District Court for the Northern District of California · December 16, 2025 · No. 25-cv-09541-RFL

Summary

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed Eric Murillo’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against West County Detention Facility Medical with leave to amend. The court held that the complaint did not adequately allege a policy, practice, or custom sufficient to support municipal liability under Monell. The court ordered any amended complaint to be filed by January 23, 2026, and warned that failure to comply could result in dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Holdings

  1. A plaintiff cannot state a Monell claim against a county or county agency merely by alleging inadequate medical care; the plaintiff must identify the constitutional right violated, identify and describe the municipality's policy, practice, or custom, and explain how that policy, practice, or custom was the moving force behind the injury.
  2. A complaint subject to § 1915A screening must allege sufficient factual matter to state a plausible claim for relief, and a complaint that fails to state a claim must be dismissed.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the complaint stated a cognizable claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 when it alleged inadequate medical care but did not identify a municipal policy, practice, or custom that caused the constitutional violation.
  2. Whether the complaint should be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim and whether leave to amend should be granted.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (11)

  • Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1988)(followed)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009)(followed)
  • Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 556, 570 (2007)(followed)
  • Clegg v. Cult Awareness Network, 18 F.3d 752, 754-55 (9th Cir. 1994)(followed)
  • West v. Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988)(followed)
  • Monell v. Department of Social Services, 436 U.S. 658 (1978)(followed)
  • Oviatt By and Through Waugh v. Pearce, 954 F.2d 1470, 1474 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • City of Canton v. Harris, 489 U.S. 378, 389 (1989)(followed)
  • Gordon v. Orange County, 6 F.4th 961, 974 (9th Cir. 2021)(followed)
  • City of Oklahoma City v. Tuttle, 471 U.S. 808, 823-24 (1985)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 11.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…