Google LLC v. LATAM Airlines Group S.A. Inc.

No. 25-cv-04984-BLF (N.D. Cal. July 2, 2025) · United States District Court for the Northern District of California · July 2, 2025 · No. 25-cv-04984-BLF

Summary

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California grants Google LLC’s administrative motion to file materials under seal in connection with its motion to expedite a preliminary-injunction hearing. Applying the good-cause standard, the court permits sealing of an unpublished Brazilian Superior Court of Justice removal order and quotations from that order because public filing could expose Google to penalties and no less restrictive alternative was adequate.

Holdings

  1. Materials filed in connection with the motion to expedite the hearing on Google's preliminary-injunction motion were subject to the lower good-cause standard rather than the compelling-reasons standard because the motion was not more than tangentially related to the merits of the underlying action.
  2. Google established good cause to seal the unpublished Brazilian court order and the quotations from that order because disclosure could subject Google to fines or penalties under the practices of the Superior Court of Justice in Brazil.
  3. The requested sealing was narrowly tailored because it limited sealing to the quoted portions of the motion to expedite and the entire unpublished Brazilian order, and the court found no less restrictive alternative sufficient to protect the information.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Google established good cause to seal an unpublished Brazilian court order and quotations from that order filed in connection with a non-dispositive motion to expedite a hearing.
  2. Whether the requested sealing was narrowly tailored under the applicable federal and local sealing standards.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (8)

  • Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978)(followed)
  • Foltz v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC, 809 F.3d 1092, 1099-1101 (9th Cir. 2016)(followed)
  • Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. General Motors Corp., 307 F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
  • Beckman Industries, Inc. v. International Insurance Co., 966 F.2d 470, 476 (9th Cir. 1992)(followed)
  • Kumandan v. Google LLC, No. 19-CV-04286-BLF, 2022 WL 1501017, at *1 (N.D. Cal. May 12, 2022)(followed)
  • D.C. v. County of San Diego, Case No. 15-cv-1868-MMA (NLS), 2021 WL 4428880, at *2-3 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 24, 2021)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…