Summary
The court addresses Plaintiff Christian Gremmels’ response to an order to show cause and correspondence seeking a PACER fee waiver. The court extends the deadline to file an amended complaint to July 28, 2025, warns that failure to correct identified defects may result in a recommendation of dismissal, and denies the PACER fee exemption request without prejudice.
Holdings
- The court extended Plaintiff's deadline to file an amended complaint to July 28, 2025.
- Plaintiff's request for a PACER fee exemption was denied without prejudice because he did not show that an exemption was necessary to avoid unreasonable burdens and promote public access to information.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should extend Plaintiff's deadline to file an amended complaint in light of his questions about the order to show cause and alleged delay in receiving it.
- Whether Plaintiff established entitlement to a PACER fee exemption.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (2)
- Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 231 (2004)(followed)
- 2016 WL 97450, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 8, 2016)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…