Howington v. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd.

No. 24-cv-05684-VKD (N.D. Cal. Aug. 29, 2025) · United States District Court for the Northern District of California · August 29, 2025 · No. 24-cv-05684-VKD

Summary

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California resolves a discovery dispute concerning requests for applicant and employee data in a putative employment discrimination class action against Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co., Ltd. The court orders production of data responsive to RFPs 1 and 2, excluding visa type and information about PERM or green-card sponsorship, and denies discovery under RFPs 3 and 4.

Holdings

  1. TSMC must produce data from its HR-related data sources and Excel files responsive to RFPs 1 and 2, except for data reflecting visa type and whether TSMC sought a permanent labor certification or green card on an employee's behalf.
  2. The court could not limit production of responsive applicant and employee data to the named plaintiffs because broader data was necessary to develop statistical evidence of alleged discrimination.
  3. TSMC was not required to produce visa-type information or information concerning whether it sought a permanent labor certification or green card on an employee's behalf.
  4. Plaintiffs were not entitled to an order compelling production of information concerning employee visa applications or PERM and green-card applications.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether plaintiffs were entitled to discovery of applicant and employee data responsive to RFPs 1 and 2 for statistical analyses of their employment-discrimination claims.
  2. Whether plaintiffs were entitled to discovery concerning employee visa applications and PERM or green-card applications responsive to RFPs 3 and 4.
  3. Whether production could be limited to information concerning the named plaintiffs rather than the broader applicant and employee populations.
  4. Whether privacy interests in immigration-related information outweighed plaintiffs' need for the requested information.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (3)

  • Diaz v. Am. Telephone & Telegraph, 752 F.2d 1356 (9th Cir. 1985)(followed)
  • Rivera v. NIBCO, Inc., 364 F.3d 1057, 1074 (9th Cir. 2004)(followed)
  • Comm. for Immigrant Rts. of Sonoma Cnty. v. Cnty. of Sonoma, No. C08-4220 RS (JL), 2010 WL 11575520, at *6 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 12, 2010)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…