J.M.V. v. Commissioner of Social Security

No. 23-cv-03640-JCS (N.D. Cal. Nov. 28, 2025) · United States District Court for the Northern District of California · November 28, 2025 · No. 23-cv-03640-JCS

Summary

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted counsel's motion for $11,000 in attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) following a remand in a Social Security case. The court found the contingent-fee agreement and requested amount reasonable, and directed that the previously awarded $7,500 in EAJA fees be paid to the claimant.

Holdings

  1. The requested $11,000 fee was reasonable and authorized under § 406(b) because it complied with the 25% statutory and contractual cap, was supported by a valid contingency-fee agreement and reasonable time records, and was not excessive in light of counsel's performance, result, risk, or effective hourly rate.
  2. The $7,500 EAJA fee previously awarded to counsel must be paid to J.M.V. as an offset against the § 406(b) fee award.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether counsel's requested $11,000 fee was reasonable under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) and the governing contingency-fee agreement.
  2. Whether the previously awarded $7,500 EAJA fee must be paid to J.M.V. as an offset against the § 406(b) award.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (4)

  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 793-94, 796, 808 (2002)(followed)
  • Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1151, 1153 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Hearn v. Barnhart, 262 F. Supp. 2d 1033, 1037 (N.D. Cal. 2003)(followed)
  • Reddick v. Berryhill, 2019 WL 1112080, at *2-*3 (S.D. Cal. 2019)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…