Summary
The court granted, as modified, Joseph Dale Young’s motion to continue case-management deadlines and reset the initial case-management conference for January 20, 2026. The court denied without prejudice his motion for appointment of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), finding no exceptional circumstances warranting appointment at that stage.
Holdings
- The court declined to continue all case-management deadlines indefinitely pending Young's release but granted a limited continuance, resetting the initial case-management conference for January 20, 2026 and adjusting related deadlines accordingly.
- An indigent civil litigant may receive appointed counsel under § 1915(e)(1) only in exceptional circumstances, and Young's motion was denied without prejudice because the circumstances did not warrant appointment at that time.
Questions Presented
- Whether the court should continue all case-management deadlines until sixty days after Young's release from custody.
- Whether Young had established exceptional circumstances warranting appointment of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1).
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (3)
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 25 (1981)(followed)
- Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), withdrawn in part on other grounds on reh'g en banc, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc)(followed)
- Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…