Joseph Dale Young v. NaphCare Inc.

Young v. NaphCare Inc. · United States District Court for the Northern District of California · October 30, 2025 · No. 25-cv-07382-VKD

Summary

The court granted, as modified, Joseph Dale Young’s motion to continue case-management deadlines and reset the initial case-management conference for January 20, 2026. The court denied without prejudice his motion for appointment of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), finding no exceptional circumstances warranting appointment at that stage.

Holdings

  1. The court declined to continue all case-management deadlines indefinitely pending Young's release but granted a limited continuance, resetting the initial case-management conference for January 20, 2026 and adjusting related deadlines accordingly.
  2. An indigent civil litigant may receive appointed counsel under § 1915(e)(1) only in exceptional circumstances, and Young's motion was denied without prejudice because the circumstances did not warrant appointment at that time.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the court should continue all case-management deadlines until sixty days after Young's release from custody.
  2. Whether Young had established exceptional circumstances warranting appointment of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1).

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (3)

  • Lassiter v. Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18, 25 (1981)(followed)
  • Rand v. Rowland, 113 F.3d 1520, 1525 (9th Cir. 1997), withdrawn in part on other grounds on reh'g en banc, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc)(followed)
  • Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…