Summary
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted plaintiff’s counsel’s motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) following a successful appeal and remand of the denial of Social Security disability benefits. The court approved $10,143.50 in fees, finding the amount reasonable under the contingency-fee agreement and applicable case law, and ordered counsel to refund $6,500 in previously awarded EAJA fees to the plaintiff.
Holdings
- A court may approve a contingency-fee agreement under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) only after independently reviewing the requested fee for reasonableness; the court approved $10,143.50 as reasonable because the agreement was within the 25-percent statutory ceiling, counsel achieved a favorable remand and benefits award, there was no substandard or deliberately dilatory representation, the fee was not excessive in relation to the benefits, and counsel assumed substantial risk.
- An award of § 406(b) attorney's fees must be offset by any EAJA fee award, and counsel must refund the previously awarded $6,500.00 in EAJA fees to Plaintiff.
- The court declined to award the additional $715.00 because counsel conceded that she was not entitled to those fees; the SSA was directed to release the remaining amount to Plaintiff.
Questions Presented
- Whether the requested attorney's fee under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) was reasonable and within the statutory 25-percent limitation.
- Whether the § 406(b) award had to be offset by the previously awarded EAJA fees.
- Whether counsel's requested reduction for scheduling delays should be treated as a refund or excluded from the fee award.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (6)
- Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1144 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc)(followed)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796, 807-08 (2002)(followed)
- Parrish v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 698 F.3d 1215, 1218 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- James F. v. King, 2025 WL 510432 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2025)(followed)
- Mirto v. Colvin, No. 23-CV-03198-SVK, 2024 WL 5250081 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 30, 2024)(followed)
- Barton v. Colvin, No. 21-CV-9662-RMI, 2024 WL 5173257 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 18, 2024)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…