Rodriguez Diaz v. Kaiser

Rodriguez Diaz · United States District Court for the Northern District of California · June 14, 2025 · No. 3:25-cv-05071

Summary

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Arnoldo Rodriguez Diaz’s ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order. The order prohibits immigration authorities from re-detaining him without notice and a hearing, remains effective until June 23, 2025, and directs the respondents to show cause why a preliminary injunction should not issue.

Holdings

  1. A temporary restraining order was warranted because the petitioner showed serious questions concerning whether due process requires a hearing before re-detention, likely irreparable harm from detention, and that the balance of equities and public interest sharply favored temporary relief.
  2. No security was required because the court found no realistic likelihood of harm to the government from temporarily enjoining re-detention.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the petitioner was entitled to an ex parte temporary restraining order preventing immigration authorities from re-detaining him before providing notice and an opportunity for a hearing.
  2. Whether the court should require security under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65(c) as a condition of issuing the temporary restraining order.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (21)

  • Washington v. Trump, 847 F.3d 1151, 1159 n.3 (9th Cir. 2017)(followed)
  • Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 20, 22 (2008)(followed)
  • E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump, 932 F.3d 742, 779 (9th Cir. 2019)(followed)
  • Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers Local No. 70, 415 U.S. 423, 439 (1974)(followed)
  • Friends of the Wild Swan v. Weber, 767 F.3d 936, 942 (9th Cir. 2014)(followed)
  • Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 435 (2009)(followed)
  • Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 690 (2001)(followed)
  • Foucha v. Louisiana, 504 U.S. 71, 80 (1992)(followed)
  • Ortiz Vargas v. Jennings, No. 20-cv-5785, 2020 WL 5074312, at *3-4 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 23, 2020)(followed)
  • Ortega v. Bonnar, 415 F. Supp. 3d 963, 969-70 (N.D. Cal. 2019)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 21.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…