Sergey Firsov v. Scandinavian Airlines System Denmark-Norway-Sweden

Firsov v. Scandinavian Airlines System Denmark-Norway-Sweden, No. 25-cv-03691-EMC, Docket No. 61 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2025) · United States District Court for the Northern District of California · December 7, 2025 · No. 25-cv-03691-EMC; Docket No. 61

Summary

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied Sergey Firsov’s motion to reconsider an earlier order concerning sanctions, a motion to strike, service costs, and a motion to dismiss. The court held that Firsov failed to satisfy the procedural and substantive standards for reconsideration and upheld sanctions based on his continued assertion that the defendant had exceeded the applicable page limit.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiff was not entitled to leave to file the motion for reconsideration because he failed to comply with the procedural requirement to request leave and failed to demonstrate a basis for reconsideration under Civil Local Rule 7-9.
  2. The court declined to reconsider its sanctions ruling because plaintiff continued to assert that defendant had filed an excessive-page motion despite the prior order resolving that issue, and the court found plaintiff had acted in bad faith.
  3. A pro se litigant may not represent anyone other than himself.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether plaintiff was entitled to leave to file a motion for reconsideration under Civil Local Rule 7-9.
  2. Whether the court should reconsider its prior rulings concerning the page limit of defendant's motion to dismiss, sanctions against plaintiff, the procedural propriety of requesting sanctions in opposition briefs, and recovery of service costs.
  3. Whether plaintiff could pursue a proposed class action or represent other persons while proceeding pro se.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (2)

  • Firsov v. United Airlines, Inc., No. 25-3784 BLF (Docket No. 40)(applied)
  • C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States, 818 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir. 1987)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…