Summary
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California grants Plaintiffs’ unopposed motions for final approval of a class action settlement and for attorneys’ fees, costs, and incentive awards. The settlement provides for a $20 million non-reversionary fund for purchasers of certain Apple Watch models who reported battery-swelling-related issues, with class payments generally estimated at approximately $25 per covered device. The Court approves $5 million in attorneys’ fees, $433,417.83 in litigation expenses, and $27,000 in incentive awards.
Holdings
- The settlement was fair, adequate, and reasonable under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e), and the class received adequate notice; final approval was therefore warranted.
- Class counsel was entitled to $5,000,000 in attorneys' fees and $433,417.83 in litigation expenses from the common settlement fund.
- The requested incentive awards were reasonable, and the court awarded $5,000 to lead plaintiff Chris Smith and $2,000 to each of the remaining named plaintiffs.
Questions Presented
- Whether the proposed class action settlement satisfied Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(e)'s requirements of fairness, reasonableness, adequacy, and adequate notice.
- Whether the requested attorneys' fees and litigation expenses were reasonable under the common-fund doctrine and applicable fee-award standards.
- Whether the requested incentive awards for the named plaintiffs were reasonable and proportionate to their service to the class.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (23)
- Dennis v. Kellogg Co., 697 F.3d 858, 865 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp., 150 F.3d 1011, 1019-22, 1025 (9th Cir. 1998)(followed)
- Roes, 1-2 v. SFBSC Mgmt., LLC, 944 F.3d 1035, 1043, 1049 (9th Cir. 2019)(followed)
- In re Bluetooth Headset Prods. Liab. Litig., 654 F.3d 935, 941-42, 946 (9th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- McKinney-Drobnis v. Oreshack, 16 F.4th 594, 607-09 (9th Cir. 2021)(followed)
- Churchill Vill., LLC v. Gen. Elec., 361 F.3d 566, 575 (9th Cir. 2004)(followed)
- Chun-Hoon v. McKee Foods Corp., 716 F. Supp. 2d 848, 851 (N.D. Cal. 2010)(followed)
- Rodriguez v. W. Publ'g Corp., 563 F.3d 948, 958-59, 966 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Ching v. Siemens Indus., Inc., No. 11-cv-04838-MEJ, 2014 WL 2926210, at *4 (N.D. Cal. June 27, 2014)(followed)
- Villanueva v. Morpho Detection, Inc., No. 13-cv-05390-HSG, 2016 WL 1070523, at *4 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 18, 2016)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 23.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.