Ugalde v. Syngenta Flowers, LLC

Ugalde · United States District Court for the Northern District of California · July 1, 2025 · No. 24-cv-07568-EKL

Summary

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted defendants’ motion to compel arbitration in a disability discrimination and wrongful termination action. The court found that the plaintiff’s electronic signature on a voluntary arbitration agreement was authenticated, that the agreement was not procedurally unconscionable, and that defendants had not waived arbitration. The court also stayed the proceedings pending resolution of the arbitration.

Holdings

  1. Defendants established by a preponderance of the evidence that Plaintiff's electronic signature was authentic and was the act of Plaintiff.
  2. The arbitration agreement was not procedurally unconscionable because it was expressly voluntary and did not condition employment on signature.
  3. Defendants did not waive their right to arbitrate.
  4. Plaintiff's claims were referable to arbitration because the agreement covered claims arising from or relating to her employment or termination by ASINC.
  5. The court was required to stay proceedings on claims and issues referable to arbitration pending resolution of the arbitration.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether defendants authenticated Plaintiff's electronic signature sufficiently to establish the existence of an arbitration agreement.
  2. Whether the arbitration agreement was procedurally unconscionable and therefore unenforceable.
  3. Whether defendants waived their contractual right to arbitrate.
  4. Whether Plaintiff's claims were within the scope of the arbitration agreement.
  5. Whether the action should be stayed pending arbitration under 9 U.S.C. § 3.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (15)

  • Godun v. JustAnswer LLC, 135 F.4th 699, 708 (9th Cir. 2025)(followed)
  • Brennan v. Opus Bank, 796 F.3d 1125, 1130 (9th Cir. 2015)(followed)
  • Ruiz v. Moss Bros. Auto Grp., 232 Cal. App. 4th 836, 842-46 (2014)(followed)
  • Cohen v. TNP 2008 Participating Notes Program, LLC, 31 Cal. App. 5th 840, 856 (2019)(followed)
  • Espejo v. S. Cal. Permanente Med. Grp., 246 Cal. App. 4th 1047, 1062 (2016)(followed)
  • Fabian v. Renovate Am., Inc., 42 Cal. App. 5th 1062, 1068 (2019)(followed)
  • Mohamed v. Uber Techs., Inc., 848 F.3d 1201, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2017)(followed)
  • Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc., 24 Cal. 4th 83, 114 (2000)(followed)
  • Pinnacle Museum Tower Ass'n v. Pinnacle Mkt. Dev. (US), LLC, 55 Cal. 4th 223, 236, 246-47 (2012)(followed)
  • Poublon v. C.H. Robinson Co., 846 F.3d 1251, 1260 (9th Cir. 2017)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 15.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…