Werts v. Saul

Werts · United States District Court for the Northern District of California · April 21, 2025 · No. 5:20-cv-03751-EJD

Summary

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Plaintiff Sarah Werts’s motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) following a successful remand and award of Social Security disability benefits. The court approved $44,183.44 in fees, representing approximately 16% of past-due benefits, and ordered counsel to refund $4,183.44 received under the Equal Access to Justice Act.

Holdings

  1. A court may approve a contingent fee under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) when the fee does not exceed the statutory 25% limit and is reasonable in light of the character of the representation, the results achieved, the absence of substandard or dilatory conduct, and the effective hourly rate. The requested $44,183.44 fee was reasonable and was approved.
  2. When an attorney receives fees under both the EAJA and § 406(b), the attorney must refund to the claimant the amount of the smaller fee.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the requested $44,183.44 attorney's fee under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) was reasonable and should be approved.
  2. Whether counsel was required to refund to Plaintiff the smaller fee previously received under the Equal Access to Justice Act.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (6)

  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 807 (2002)(followed)
  • Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1151 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
  • Laboy v. Colvin, 631 F. App'x 468, 469 (9th Cir. 2016)(followed)
  • L.M. v. Kijakazi, No. 17-CV-03562-JCS, 2023 WL 7251505, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2023)(followed)
  • Jacomet v. Kijakazi, No. 2:18-CV-0199 DB, 2023 WL 5723085, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 5, 2023)(followed)
  • Spina v. Kijakazi, No. 19-CV-05171-BLF, 2023 WL 3977666, at *1 (N.D. Cal. June 13, 2023)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…