Summary
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Plaintiff Sarah Werts’s motion for attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) following a successful remand and award of Social Security disability benefits. The court approved $44,183.44 in fees, representing approximately 16% of past-due benefits, and ordered counsel to refund $4,183.44 received under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
Holdings
- A court may approve a contingent fee under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) when the fee does not exceed the statutory 25% limit and is reasonable in light of the character of the representation, the results achieved, the absence of substandard or dilatory conduct, and the effective hourly rate. The requested $44,183.44 fee was reasonable and was approved.
- When an attorney receives fees under both the EAJA and § 406(b), the attorney must refund to the claimant the amount of the smaller fee.
Questions Presented
- Whether the requested $44,183.44 attorney's fee under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) was reasonable and should be approved.
- Whether counsel was required to refund to Plaintiff the smaller fee previously received under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (6)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 807 (2002)(followed)
- Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1151 (9th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Laboy v. Colvin, 631 F. App'x 468, 469 (9th Cir. 2016)(followed)
- L.M. v. Kijakazi, No. 17-CV-03562-JCS, 2023 WL 7251505, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 2, 2023)(followed)
- Jacomet v. Kijakazi, No. 2:18-CV-0199 DB, 2023 WL 5723085, at *2 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 5, 2023)(followed)
- Spina v. Kijakazi, No. 19-CV-05171-BLF, 2023 WL 3977666, at *1 (N.D. Cal. June 13, 2023)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…