Latrice Nelson v. Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC

Nelson v. Macy's · United States District Court for the Northern District of California · January 7, 2026 · No. 3:25-cv-05541-JSC

Summary

The United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied Macy's motion to compel arbitration in a wage-and-hour class action brought by a former employee. The court held that the plaintiff was a transportation worker engaged in interstate commerce and therefore exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act under 9 U.S.C. § 1. The court maintained the scheduled case management conference, subject to possible vacatur if Macy's appeals and seeks a stay.

Holdings

  1. Plaintiff was a transportation worker engaged in interstate commerce and was therefore exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act under 9 U.S.C. § 1.
  2. Macy's motion to compel arbitration was denied because Plaintiff falls within the FAA's Section 1 transportation-worker exemption.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Plaintiff was a transportation worker engaged in interstate commerce and therefore exempt from the Federal Arbitration Act under 9 U.S.C. § 1.
  2. Whether Macy's supplemental evidence created a factual dispute regarding the interstate nature of the merchandise Plaintiff handled sufficient to support compelling arbitration.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (2)

  • Ortiz v. Randstad Inhouse Servs., LLC, 95 F.4th 1152, 1163 (9th Cir. 2024)(applied)
  • Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski, 599 U.S. 736, 747 (2023)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…