Summary
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted Defendants’ motions to dismiss and dismissed Plaintiffs’ complaint in its entirety under the doctrine of forum non conveniens. The Court held that China was an adequate alternative forum and that the private and public interest factors strongly favored dismissal. The dispute involved alleged false advertising and unfair competition concerning competing PDF software products.
Holdings
- China was an adequate alternative forum because Defendants were amenable to process there and Chinese law provided Plaintiffs at least some potential avenue for redress.
- The private and public interest factors strongly favored dismissal of Plaintiffs' complaint in favor of litigation in China.
Questions Presented
- Whether China was an adequate alternative forum for Plaintiffs' false advertising and unfair competition claims.
- Whether the private and public interest factors favored dismissal under the doctrine of forum non conveniens.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (8)
- Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno, 454 U.S. 235, 241, 255 n.22, 257 (1981)(followed)
- Lueck v. Sundstrand Corp., 236 F.3d 1137, 1142, 1144-45 (9th Cir. 2001)(followed)
- Cheng v. Boeing Co., 708 F.2d 1406, 1411 (9th Cir. 1983)(followed)
- Ceramic Corp. of Am. v. Inka Mar. Corp. Inc., 1 F.3d 947, 949 (9th Cir. 1993)(followed)
- Dole Food Co., Inc. v. Watts, 303 F.3d 1104, 1118 (9th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- CYBERsitter, LLC v. People's Republic of China, 2010 WL 4909958, at *4-5 (C.D. Cal. 2011)(followed)
- In re Montage Tech. Grp. Ltd. Sec. Litig., 78 F. Supp. 3d 1215, 1222-23, 1226-27 (N.D. Cal. 2015)(distinguished)
- Tuazon v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 433 F.3d 1163, 1181 (9th Cir. 2006)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…