Summary
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California grants Katherine R. Siegfried’s motion for $34,996 in attorney’s fees under section 206(b) of the Social Security Act after remand resulted in a favorable benefits decision for Wyatt Brafford. The court finds the contingent fee reasonable and directs counsel to refund the previously awarded $7,500 in EAJA fees to Plaintiff.
Holdings
- The requested $34,996 fee was reasonable because it complied with the 25-percent statutory ceiling and the contingent-fee agreement, counsel achieved a favorable result, there was no evidence of substandard or dilatory representation, and the case involved a substantial risk of loss.
- Counsel must refund the previously awarded $7,500 in EAJA fees to Brafford after receiving the reasonable § 406(b) fee.
Questions Presented
- Whether counsel's requested $34,996 fee under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), equal to 25 percent of Brafford's past-due benefits, was reasonable.
- Whether the § 406(b) fee award had to be offset by the previously awarded $7,500 in EAJA fees and refunded to Brafford.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (12)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 798 n.6 (2002)(followed)
- Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796, 807-09 (2002)(followed)
- Crawford v. Astrue, 586 F.3d 1142, 1144, 1151-53 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc)(followed)
- Parrish v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 698 F.3d 1215, 1218 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- N.N. v. Bisignano, 2025 WL 2856296, at *3 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 8, 2025)(followed)
- Brenn v. O'Malley, 2025 WL 2419268, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 21, 2025)(followed)
- Moreno v. City of Sacramento, 534 F.3d 1106, 1112 (9th Cir. 2008)(followed)
- Costa v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. Admin., 690 F.3d 1132, 1136 (9th Cir. 2012)(followed)
- Hearn v. Barnhart, 262 F. Supp. 2d 1033, 1037 (N.D. Cal. 2003)(followed)
- Kraft v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., 2025 WL 3522722, at *2 (N.D. Cal. Dec. 9, 2025)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 12.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…