Barr v. Meekins, et al.

Barr · United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida, Gainesville Division · May 6, 2026 · No. 1:25cv323/MW/ZCB

Summary

The magistrate judge recommends denying the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and protective order concerning alleged interstate stalking and law-enforcement nonresponse. The recommendation concludes that the requested relief is unrelated to the claims in the third amended complaint and seeks relief against nonparties, beyond the court’s authority.

Holdings

  1. Preliminary injunctive relief should be denied when the conduct addressed by the motion is not closely related to the conduct alleged in the underlying complaint.
  2. A court lacks authority to issue a preliminary injunction against persons or entities that are not parties to the action.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether preliminary injunctive relief may be granted when the conduct addressed by the motion is unrelated in time, place, and substance to the claims in the complaint.
  2. Whether the court may issue a preliminary injunction against individuals or entities that are not parties to the action.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (6)

  • All Care Nursing Serv., Inc. v. Bethesda Mem'l Hosp., Inc., 887 F.2d 1535, 1537 (11th Cir. 1989)(followed)
  • Hernandez v. Fla. Dep't of Corr., No. 3:05CV39, 2005 WL 1684419, at *1 (N.D. Fla. June 29, 2005), adopted, No. 305CV39, 2005 WL 1876159 (N.D. Fla. Aug. 4, 2005)(followed)
  • Torres Puello v. Guerrero Mendez, No. 5:20cv198, 2020 WL 4004481, at *2 (M.D. Fla. June 15, 2020), adopted, 2020 WL 4001896 (M.D. Fla. July 15, 2020)(followed)
  • Bethel v. Town of Loxley, No. 04-0373, 2006 WL 8437738, at *2 (S.D. Ala. Mar. 15, 2006)(followed)
  • Jackson v. Baisden, No. 21-13004, 2022 WL 610314, at *1 (11th Cir. 2022)(followed)
  • In re Infant Formula Antitrust Litig., MDL 878 v. Abbott Lab., 72 F.3d 842, 842-43 (11th Cir. 1995)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…