Summary
The magistrate judge recommends dismissal without prejudice of an incarcerated plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failing to pay the court-ordered initial partial filing fee despite having sufficient funds and for failing to comply with court orders. The recommendation relies on the court’s inherent dismissal authority, applicable local rules, and Eleventh Circuit precedent concerning payment of prisoner filing fees.
Holdings
- A prisoner civil action may be dismissed without prejudice when the plaintiff fails to pay an assessed initial partial filing fee despite having sufficient funds to do so.
- A federal court may dismiss an action without prejudice when a party fails to comply with a court order requiring payment of an initial partial filing fee.
Questions Presented
- Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to pay the initial partial filing fee despite having funds available to do so.
- Whether dismissal is appropriate for Plaintiff’s failure to comply with orders directing payment of the initial partial filing fee.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (6)
- Foudy v. Indian River Cnty. Sheriff’s Off., 845 F.3d 1117, 1126 (11th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Wilson v. Sargent, 313 F.3d 1315, 1320-21 (11th Cir. 2002)(followed)
- Walker v. Powell, 351 F. App’x 384, 386 (11th Cir. 2009)(followed)
- Lumbert v. Ill. Dep’t of Corr., 827 F.2d 257, 260 (7th Cir. 1987)(persuasive)
- Zuniga-Mejia v. Godwin, 2024 WL 1068887, at *6 (N.D. Fla. Jan. 22, 2024)(followed)
- Briand v. State of Fla., No. 4:06cv104, 2006 WL 1890189, at *1 (N.D. Fla. July 10, 2006)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…