Summary
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida adopted the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation and remanded Rajiv Shashikant Shah’s attempted removal of a Florida state criminal proceeding. The court held that Shah failed to satisfy the two-part test for removal under Georgia v. Rachel because he did not identify a formal expression of state law denying equal civil rights in state court.
Holdings
- Plaintiff did not satisfy the two-part test for removal of a state criminal proceeding because he failed to identify a formal expression of state law that would deny him equal civil rights in state court.
- The fact that Plaintiff is being prosecuted, even if he intends to assert a selective-prosecution defense, is not a formal expression of state law prohibiting enforcement of equality-based civil rights in state court.
Questions Presented
- Whether Plaintiff satisfied the two-part test for removal of a state criminal proceeding based on the denial of equal civil rights in state court.
- Whether the existence of an allegedly selective prosecution constitutes a formal expression of state law denying Plaintiff equal civil rights for purposes of federal removal.
Disposition
remanded
Cases Cited (2)
- Georgia v. Rachel, 384 U.S. 780 (1966)(followed)
- Cave v. Florida, 814 F. App'x 555, 556 (11th Cir. 2020)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…