Summary
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois denied World Business Lenders, LLC’s motion to quash a citation to discover assets in a supplementary judgment-enforcement proceeding. The court held that World Business was subject to specific personal jurisdiction because it purposefully conducted Illinois-related lending and mortgage activities, the citation was related to those activities, and exercising jurisdiction was fundamentally fair. The court directed World Business to comply with the citation.
Holdings
- A court issuing a citation to discover assets must have personal jurisdiction over the citation respondent.
- World Business purposefully availed itself of Illinois by issuing a commercial loan to Illinois residents and an Illinois LLC, securing the loan with a mortgage on Illinois real property, recording the mortgage in Illinois, and invoking Illinois law and Illinois courts in the mortgage agreement.
- World Business's Illinois contacts were sufficiently related to Aquatech's supplementary enforcement proceeding because the citation sought information concerning assets and mortgage dealings arising from World Business's Illinois business dealings with the judgment debtors.
- Exercising specific jurisdiction over World Business was consistent with traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
Questions Presented
- Whether the district court had personal jurisdiction over World Business Lenders, LLC in Aquatech's supplementary proceeding to enforce its registered judgment.
- Whether World Business purposefully availed itself of Illinois through its loan and mortgage transactions with Illinois residents and Illinois real property.
- Whether Aquatech's supplementary enforcement proceeding and citation requests were sufficiently related to World Business's Illinois contacts to support specific jurisdiction.
- Whether exercising personal jurisdiction over World Business would comport with traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (20)
- Aquatech Corp. v. Dutch Barn, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-1897 (D. Nev. Aug. 6, 2025)(followed)
- Motorola Sols., Inc. v. Hytera Comm. Corp., 2021 WL 3077305, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 25, 2021)(followed)
- Leibovitch v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 852 F.3d 687, 689 (7th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- NBA Props., Inc. v. HANWJH, 46 F.4th 614, 620 (7th Cir. 2022)(followed)
- Bilek v. Fed. Ins. Co., 8 F.4th 581, 589 (7th Cir. 2021)(followed)
- John Crane, Inc. v. Shein L. Ctr., Ltd., 891 F.3d 692, 695 (7th Cir. 2018)(followed)
- Walden v. Fiore, Walden v. Fiore, 571 U.S. 277, 283-84 (2014)(followed)
- Brook v. McCormley, 873 F.3d 549, 552 (7th Cir. 2017)(followed)
- Illinois v. Hemi Grp., 622 F.3d 754, 757 (7th Cir. 2010)(followed)
- Ford Motor Co. v. Mont. Eighth Jud. Dist. Ct., 592 U.S. 351, 352, 358-59 (2021)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 20.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…