Diego Ivan Garduno Pina v. Erika Carbajal Chavez

No. 25 CV 10337 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 6 2026) (N.D. Ill. 2026) · United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division · March 6, 2026 · No. No. 25 CV 10337; 1:25-cv-10337

Summary

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois considers a petition under the Hague Convention and ICARA seeking the return of two children to Mexico. Although the parties agreed that the children were wrongfully removed, the court denied the petition after finding that the respondent established by clear and convincing evidence a grave risk that returning the children would expose them to physical or psychological harm or place them in an intolerable situation.

Holdings

  1. Respondent established by clear and convincing evidence that returning the children to Mexico would expose them to a grave risk of physical or psychological harm.
  2. Repeated, severe physical and psychological abuse of the children’s mother in the children’s presence independently established a grave risk of psychological harm.
  3. The children faced a grave risk of physical harm because petitioner’s abuse of them was regular rather than rare or isolated and was likely to continue after return.
  4. The court would not order return subject to the proposed undertakings because the suggestions lacked sufficient detail and could not adequately assure the children’s safety where the prior status quo was abusive.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether respondent proved by clear and convincing evidence that returning the children to Mexico would expose them to a grave risk of physical or psychological harm or otherwise place them in an intolerable situation under the Hague Convention and ICARA.
  2. Whether the court’s findings of repeated domestic violence against respondent, abuse of the children, and likely continuation of that conduct established a grave risk despite the absence of police reports, medical records, or photographs.
  3. Whether proposed undertakings, including no-contact or supervised-visitation conditions, could adequately mitigate the grave risk.

Disposition

dismissed

Cases Cited (19)

  • Hernandez v. Cardoso, 844 F.3d 692, 694 (7th Cir. 2016)(followed)
  • Ho v. Ho, No. 20 C 6681-*2 (N.D. Ill. July 12, 2021)(followed)
  • RBG Plastic, LLC v. Webstaurant Store, No. 1:18-CV-05192, 2020 WL 7027601, at *4 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 30, 2020)(followed)
  • Hulsh v. Hulsh, No. 19 C 7298 (N.D. Ill. July 21, 2020)(followed)
  • Khan v. Fatima, 680 F.3d 781, 785-87 (7th Cir. 2012)(followed)
  • Van De Sande v. Van De Sande, 431 F.3d 567, 570-72 (7th Cir. 2005)(followed)
  • Norinder v. Fuentes, 657 F.3d 526, 533-34 (7th Cir. 2011)(followed)
  • Ortiz v. Martinez, 789 F.3d 722, 723 (7th Cir. 2015)(followed)
  • Moreno v. Escamilla, No. 23 CV 15736, *8 (N.D. Ill. Nov. 12, 2024)(followed)
  • Guerrero v. Oliveros, 119 F. Supp. 3d 894, 913 (N.D. Ill. 2015)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 19.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…