Nordstrom Consulting, Inc.; Steven Nordstrom v. Innova Systems, Inc.; Cheryl Nordstrom

Summary

This document is a plaintiffs’ motion for judgment as a matter of law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(a) in a federal case in the Northern District of Illinois. It argues that defendants presented legally insufficient evidence to support trade secret, trademark, trade name, common-law trademark, and DMCA claims.

Questions Presented

1. Whether defendants presented legally sufficient evidence to support their trade-secret claim.
2. Whether defendants presented legally sufficient evidence to support their trademark, tradename, and common-law trademark infringement claims.
3. Whether defendants presented legally sufficient evidence to support their DMCA claim.
4. Whether plaintiffs were entitled to judgment as a matter of law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(a).

Disposition

other