LaTONY D. BOGAN v. ANN GANGER, SCOTT NAILOR, RHYS HOWELLS, and DYLAN WALLS, C/O

Bogan · United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Western Division · December 17, 2025 · No. 3:23 C 50115

Summary

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granted summary judgment to correctional officer Scott Nailor in a prisoner's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action challenging an alleged strip search under the Eighth Amendment. The court held that the assumed search was related to legitimate institutional-security and contraband-search purposes and did not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. The court also concluded that Nailor was entitled to qualified immunity and dismissed the claims against the other defendants.

Holdings

  1. A prison strip search violates the Eighth Amendment only when it is maliciously motivated, unrelated to institutional security, and totally without penological justification. Assuming that Nailor conducted the strip search as Bogan described, the search did not violate the Eighth Amendment because it was reasonably connected to investigating a malfunctioning cell lock and locating suspected contraband.
  2. Nailor was entitled to qualified immunity because Bogan failed to show both a constitutional violation and a clearly established right prohibiting the alleged search under these circumstances.
  3. The claims against Ganger, Howells, and Walls were dismissed because the record did not support their personal involvement in the alleged strip search, and Howells's special representative had not been served.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether the alleged strip search violated Bogan's Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishment.
  2. Whether Defendant Nailor was entitled to qualified immunity.
  3. Whether claims against Defendants Ganger, Howells, and Walls could proceed based on the evidence presented.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (29)

  • Dunn v. Menard, Inc., 880 F.3d 899, 905 (7th Cir. 2018)(followed)
  • Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249 (1986)(followed)
  • Burton v. Downey, 805 F.3d 776, 783 (7th Cir. 2015)(followed)
  • Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 323 (1986)(followed)
  • Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586-87 (1986)(followed)
  • Flowers v. Kia Motors Fin., 105 F.4th 939, 946 (7th Cir. 2024)(followed)
  • Florence v. Bd. of Chosen Freeholders of Cnty. of Burlington, 566 U.S. 318, 326-30 (2012)(followed)
  • Meriwether v. Faulkner, 821 F.2d 408, 418 (7th Cir. 1987)(followed)
  • Jones v. Anderson, 116 F.4th 669, 678 (7th Cir. 2024)(followed)
  • Whitman v. Nesic, 368 F.3d 931, 934 (7th Cir. 2004)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 29.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…