Thomas A. Kuemmel, Jr. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Kuemmel · United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, Fort Wayne Division · May 14, 2026 · No. 1:20-CV-239-TLS

Summary

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana granted the plaintiff’s attorney’s motion for supplemental attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). The court awarded $8,695.25 based on dependent benefits awarded after remand, finding the requested fee reasonable and requiring the previously awarded EAJA fees to offset the § 406(b) award.

Holdings

  1. A court may award a reasonable fee under § 406(b) to an attorney who successfully represented a claimant in federal court, subject to the statutory cap based on past-due benefits, including the past-due dependent benefits at issue here.
  2. The requested $8,695.25 supplemental fee was reasonable and should be awarded.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether counsel was entitled to a supplemental attorney-fee award under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) based on past-due dependent benefits awarded after remand.
  2. Whether the requested $8,695.25 fee was reasonable and within the statutory twenty-five-percent limitation.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (5)

  • Culbertson v. Berryhill, 586 U.S. 53, 55 (2019)(followed)
  • Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 792, 794, 796, 808 (2002)(followed)
  • Arnold v. O'Malley, 106 F.4th 595, 601 (7th Cir. 2024)(followed)
  • Long v. Saul, No. 3:19-CV-155, 2021 WL 2588110, at *1 (N.D. Ind. June 24, 2021)(followed)
  • Koester v. Astrue, 482 F. Supp. 2d 1078, 1083 (E.D. Wis. 2007)(followed)

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…