Starlite Jones v. Zimmer, Inc. d/b/a Zimmer Biomet

Jones · United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division · December 19, 2025 · No. 3:24cv255 DRL

Summary

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana grants Zimmer, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment in Starlite Jones’s Title VII action. Jones alleged race discrimination in her termination, a race-based hostile work environment, and retaliation. The court concludes that she failed to establish pretext, employer negligence in addressing alleged coworker harassment, or other evidence sufficient to support her claims.

Holdings

  1. Summary judgment was proper on Jones's termination-discrimination claim because, although Jones identified a potentially comparable white coworker, the record did not permit a reasonable jury to find that Zimmer's stated workplace-conduct rationale was a pretext for racial discrimination or that race caused the termination.
  2. Summary judgment was proper on the hostile-work-environment claim because Jones did not establish, and did not meaningfully contest, employer liability, and the undisputed record showed that Zimmer reasonably investigated and responded to her complaints.
  3. Summary judgment was proper on Jones's retaliation claim because the evidence, consisting principally of temporal proximity, did not permit a reasonable jury to find that her report of the racist text message caused her termination.

Questions Presented

  1. Whether Jones presented sufficient evidence for a reasonable factfinder to conclude that Zimmer terminated her because of her race.
  2. Whether Zimmer was liable for a race-based hostile work environment allegedly created by Jones's coworker.
  3. Whether Jones presented sufficient evidence of a causal connection between her report of racially derogatory text messages and her termination to support a Title VII retaliation claim.

Disposition

other

Cases Cited (42)

  • Lauth v. Covance, Inc., 863 F.3d 708, 710, 716-17 (7th Cir. 2017)(followed)
  • 1st Source Bank v. Vill. of Stevensville, 947 F. Supp. 2d 934, 937 (N.D. Ind. 2013)(followed)
  • Cady v. Sheahan, 467 F.3d 1057, 1060 (7th Cir. 2006)(followed)
  • Smith v. Lamz, 321 F.3d 680, 683 (7th Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • Beardsall v. CVS Pharm., Inc., 953 F.3d 969, 972 (7th Cir. 2020)(followed)
  • Bellaver v. Quanex Corp./Nichols-Homeshield, 200 F.3d 485, 491-92 (7th Cir. 2000)(followed)
  • Payne v. Pauley, 337 F.3d 767, 770 (7th Cir. 2003)(followed)
  • Joll v. Valparaiso Cmty. Schs., 953 F.3d 923, 924-25 (7th Cir. 2020)(followed)
  • Waldridge v. Am. Hoechst Corp., 24 F.3d 918, 920 (7th Cir. 1994)(followed)
  • Nelson v. Napolitano, 657 F.3d 586, 590 (7th Cir. 2011)(followed)

Showing top 10 of 42.

Cited In (0)

No citing cases on record yet.

Court Document

Open PDF
Loading document…