Summary
The court rules on cross-motions for summary judgment in a prisoner civil-rights action concerning alleged deliberate indifference to an H. pylori infection and unsanitary conditions of confinement. It denies the defendants' exhaustion-based motion regarding the medical-treatment and injunctive-relief claims, denies the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, and grants summary judgment to the state defendants on the conditions-of-confinement claim. The court dismisses Assistant Warden Buss and allows the remaining claims to proceed.
Holdings
- The Medical Defendants did not establish that Gaulden failed to exhaust available administrative remedies before filing suit. Because the grievance office failed to respond to his grievance and subsequent notices, Gaulden exhausted all remedies that were available to him as of the filing date.
- The State Defendants failed to establish that Gaulden had an available administrative remedy that he did not exhaust for his claim seeking injunctive relief concerning treatment for his H. pylori infection.
- Gaulden failed to exhaust available administrative remedies for his conditions-of-confinement claim, and summary judgment was warranted for the State Defendants on that claim.
- Gaulden's motion for summary judgment was denied because it improperly sought judgment based on exhaustion, which is an affirmative defense raised by defendants.
Questions Presented
- Whether the Medical Defendants proved that Gaulden failed to exhaust available administrative remedies before filing his claims concerning treatment for his H. pylori infection.
- Whether Gaulden exhausted available administrative remedies for his official-capacity claim seeking injunctive relief concerning treatment for his H. pylori infection.
- Whether Gaulden exhausted available administrative remedies for his conditions-of-confinement claim concerning contaminated water and unsanitary conditions.
- Whether Gaulden was entitled to summary judgment based on his assertion that he exhausted administrative remedies.
Disposition
other
Cases Cited (10)
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986)(followed)
- Heft v. Moore, 351 F.3d 278, 282 (7th Cir. 2003)(followed)
- Goodman v. National Security Agency, Inc., 621 F.3d 651, 654 (7th Cir. 2010)(followed)
- Perez v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections, 182 F.3d 532, 535 (7th Cir. 1999)(followed)
- King v. McCarty, 781 F.3d 889, 893 (7th Cir. 2015)(followed)
- Lockett v. Bonson, 937 F.3d 1016, 1025 (7th Cir. 2019)(followed)
- Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 102 (2006)(followed)
- Kaba v. Stepp, 458 F.3d 678, 684 (7th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Dole v. Chandler, 438 F.3d 804, 809 (7th Cir. 2006)(followed)
- Mayberry v. Schlarf, No. 3:23-CV-64-JD-JEM, 2024 WL 4274856, at *3 (N.D. Ind. Sept. 24, 2024)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…