Summary
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana dismissed Glenn D. Chupp’s amended prisoner complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim. The court held that the allegations concerning medication, disciplinary write-ups, Centurion Health, and Mr. Grant did not plausibly establish that either defendant violated Chupp’s rights.
Holdings
- The amended complaint failed to state a claim because it did not allege sufficient facts from which it could plausibly be inferred that either defendant violated Chupp's rights.
- Dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A was proper because the amended complaint still failed to state a claim after Chupp had been given an opportunity to correct the deficiencies in his original complaint.
Questions Presented
- Whether the amended prisoner complaint stated a plausible claim for relief against Centurion Health and Grant.
- Whether dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A was proper after the plaintiff had already been given an opportunity to amend.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (4)
- Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)(followed)
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 570 (2007)(followed)
- Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 679 (2009)(followed)
- Swanson v. Citibank, N.A., 614 F.3d 400, 403 (7th Cir. 2010)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…