Summary
The court grants the LaPorte County Sheriff’s Rule 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss the official-capacity claim seeking injunctive relief for opioid-withdrawal treatment. Because the plaintiff was transferred from the LaPorte County Jail and showed no likelihood of retransfer, the court concludes that the injunctive-relief claim is moot and dismisses the Sheriff. The case proceeds solely on the individual-capacity claim against Nurse McKayla.
Holdings
- A prisoner's request for injunctive relief against officials of a former prison is moot after the prisoner is transferred to another prison unless he demonstrates that he is likely to be transferred back.
- The court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Cislo's official-capacity claim against the LaPorte County Sheriff because the claim was moot.
Questions Presented
- Whether Cislo's request for permanent injunctive relief against the LaPorte County Sheriff became moot after Cislo was transferred from the LaPorte County Jail to another correctional facility.
- Whether the court therefore lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the official-capacity claim against the Sheriff.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (4)
- St. John’s United Church of Christ v. City of Chicago, 502 F.3d 616, 625 (7th Cir. 2007)(followed)
- Pakovich v. Verizon LTD Plan, 653 F.3d 488, 492 (7th Cir. 2011)(followed)
- Higgason v. Farley, 83 F.3d 807, 811 (7th Cir. 1996)(followed)
- Maddox v. Love, 655 F.3d 709, 716 (7th Cir. 2011)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…