Summary
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana dismissed Charles M. McDaniel’s prisoner civil-rights complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. The court held that his claims concerning disciplinary sanctions and loss of earned credit time could not proceed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 because success would undermine the disciplinary finding, and that amendment would be futile.
Holdings
- A prisoner cannot proceed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on claims challenging a disciplinary proceeding resulting in the loss of earned credit time until the disciplinary proceeding has been overturned, when success on the civil claims would undermine the disciplinary finding of guilt.
- The complaint was subject to dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A because it failed to state a cognizable claim under § 1983.
- Leave to amend was denied because amendment would be futile.
Questions Presented
- Whether McDaniel could pursue under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims challenging disciplinary proceedings that resulted in the loss of earned credit time when success would undermine the disciplinary finding.
- Whether the complaint should be dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A rather than amended.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (5)
- Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007)(followed)
- Edwards v. Balisok, 520 U.S. 641, 643 (1997)(followed)
- Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 488 (1973)(followed)
- Abu-Shawish v. United States, 898 F.3d 726, 738 (7th Cir. 2018)(followed)
- Russell v. Zimmer, Inc., 82 F.4th 564, 572 (7th Cir. 2023)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…