Summary
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana granted Sambo Thach’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The court held that, after more than six months of detention following a removal order, the government had not shown that Thach’s removal to Vietnam was reasonably foreseeable under Zadvydas v. Davis. The court ordered his release on the same supervised-release conditions that existed before his redetention and required certification of compliance.
Holdings
- Sections 1252(g) and 1252(b)(9) did not deprive the district court of jurisdiction to consider Thach's habeas challenge to his continued immigration detention.
- After the presumptively reasonable six-month detention period, continued detention under § 1231 is not authorized when removal is no longer reasonably foreseeable.
- Thach was entitled to release because the respondent failed to demonstrate that his removal was reasonably foreseeable.
Questions Presented
- Whether 8 U.S.C. §§ 1252(g) and 1252(b)(9) deprived the district court of subject-matter jurisdiction over Thach's § 2241 challenge to his post-removal-order detention.
- Whether Thach's continued detention was authorized under 8 U.S.C. § 1231 when his removal was not reasonably foreseeable.
- Whether the government rebutted Thach's showing that there was no significant likelihood of his removal in the reasonably foreseeable future.
Disposition
writ_granted
Cases Cited (3)
- Liang v. English, No. 3:25CV1052 DRL-SJF, 2026 WL 835853, at *1 (N.D. Ind. Mar. 26, 2026)(followed)
- Pho v. Noem, No. 3:25-CV-977-CCB-SJF, 2025 WL 3750684, at *1-*4 (N.D. Ind. Dec. 29, 2025)(followed)
- Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 689, 699-701 (2001)(followed)
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…