Summary
The court granted the Postal Service’s motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process. It held that the plaintiff was required to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i) when serving the United States Postal Service, including service on the United States and the agency, and that service on a Postal Service employee alone was insufficient. The case was dismissed without prejudice because the plaintiff failed to show good cause for the defective service.
Holdings
- Service on a Postal Service employee alone did not properly serve the United States Postal Service because 39 U.S.C. § 409(b) requires service in the manner applicable to suits against the United States, including the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(i).
- For an action against the Postal Service, the federal requirements of Rule 4(i) govern even when the attempted service occurred before removal from state court.
- Plaintiff did not establish good cause for failing to properly serve the Postal Service within the applicable period.
- The court exercised its discretion to dismiss the action without prejudice rather than quash service and retain the case.
Questions Presented
- Whether service of a state-court petition on a Postal Service employee alone constitutes proper service on the United States Postal Service.
- Whether the federal service requirements for suits against the Postal Service apply when service occurred before removal.
- Whether the action should be dismissed without prejudice or service should instead be quashed and the case retained.
- Whether plaintiff established good cause for failing to effect proper service within the applicable 90-day period.
Disposition
dismissed
Cases Cited (17)
- Printed Media Servs., Inc. v. Solna Web, Inc., 11 F.3d 838, 843 (8th Cir. 1993)(followed)
- Adams v. AlliedSignal Gen. Aviation Avionics, 74 F.3d 882, 885, 887 (8th Cir. 1996)(followed)
- Patterson v. Menard, Inc., No. 414CV00274, 2015 WL 12762272, at *6 (S.D. Iowa Dec. 22, 2015)(followed)
- Newton v. Chicago & N. W. Transp. Co., No. CIV. 83-640, 1986 WL 307, at *1 (S.D. Iowa Feb. 19, 1986)(followed)
- Rennenger v. Manley Toy Direct L.L.C., No. 4:10-CV-00400, 2013 WL 12159451, at *2 (S.D. Iowa July 18, 2013)(followed)
- Launch Mktg. LLC v. Golden Krust Caribbean Bakery, Inc., No. 5:23-CV-5092, 2023 WL 4977794, at *3 (W.D. Ark. Aug. 3, 2023)(followed)
- Barner v. Thompson, 796 F.3d 897, 900 (8th Cir. 2015)(followed)
- Douglass v. United States Postal Serv., No. 3:17-CV-250, 2017 WL 2225187, at *1 (N.D. Ind. May 22, 2017)(followed)
- Anwar v. United States Postal Serv., No. C22-1156, 2022 WL 9350963, at *3 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 14, 2022)(followed)
- Lynch v. United State Postal Serv., No. 21-CV-01322, 2021 WL 7448623, at *1-2 (N.D. Cal. Apr. 5, 2021)(followed)
Showing top 10 of 17.
Cited In (0)
No citing cases on record yet.
Court Document
Open PDFLoading document…